You are here

Disable VAT on Taiwan

Unfortunately, as of 1 January 2020 SAGE Ltd is no longer able to support sales of electronically supplied services to Taiwan customers that are not Taiwan VAT registered. We apologise for any inconvenience. For more information or to place a print-only order, please contact uk.customerservices@sagepub.co.uk.

Belonging

Belonging

eISSN: 30290805 | ISSN: 30290805

The aim of this journal is to provide an international platform for the dissemination of scholarly work around the concept of belonging. Scholarly work will include, but not necessarily be limited to, original data-driven research from both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, theoretical and conceptual articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, meta-syntheses, case studies, and commentaries related to the study of belonging. Given the comprehensive nature of belonging, this journal will serve as a platform for articles that focus on specific experts, contexts, and methodologies.

The scope of this journal will reflect the disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary nature of the concept of belonging, and will include special issues or topics that reflect trends and current events within the global community.

Disciplinary. With the advancement of technologies for studying the human brain, unpacking the neuroscience of belonging would be an example of a discipline-specific topic for this journal. These topics would be narrow in focus and situate themselves within a single discipline. Other examples include the study of interventions to enhance belongingness in specific contexts.

Multidisciplinary. Topics will reflect the collaborative nature of two independent disciplines working together to address the elements, processes, relationships, and implications behind belongingness. For example, a sociologist, psychologist, and educational researcher may address belonging in the context of classrooms and minoritized student populations. Another example would be the role of technology in shaping belonging.

Interdisciplinary. Topics through this lens will reflect the intersectionality of belongingness with identities such as race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation across all contexts. What separates interdisciplinary topics from multidisciplinary topics is the cross-cutting nature of the topic. For example, this intersectionality is integrated across all contexts of the global community. Other examples include the understanding of belongingness in diverse contexts such as society, community, workplace, school, and home and the impact of belongingness on well-being and performance in diverse contexts.

Transdisciplinary. The concept of belonging lends itself to ideas, principles, and practices that transcend any traditional field and, instead, reflect the human condition. For example, findings from the body of research around belonging have identified and confirmed a core human principle: we are social beings that need to feel as if we are a part of a larger group that values, respects, and cares for us (Cohen, 2022). This core human principle transcends any discipline. Another example would be the development of belongingness over the life span.

References: Cohen, G. L. (2022). Belonging. The science of creating connection and bridging divides. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Editor-in-Chief
John Almarode James Madison University, USA
Roiyah Saltus University of South Wales, UK
Terrell L. Strayhorn Virginia Union University, USA
Editorial Board
Boadi Agyekum University of Ghana, Ghana
Mi Young Ahn Goldsmiths, UK
Kelly-Ann Allen Monash University, Australia
Gökmen Arslan Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey
Faramarz Asanjarani Isfahan University, Iran
Hüsnünur Aslantürk Anadolu University, Turkey
Roy Baumeister President, International Positive Psychology Association, USA
Miron Kumar Bhowmik Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Paolo Boccagni University of Trento, Italy
Shannon Brady Wake Forest University, USA
Malika Carter-Hoyt James Madison University, USA
Clayton Chin University of Melbourne, Australia
Wendell Cockshaw The Wesley-St Andrew's Research Institute, Australia
Dorothy Espelage University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Carol Farbotko Griffith University, Australia
Douglas Fisher San Diego State University, USA
Nancy Frey San Diego State University, USA
Tina Gao Fang Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Nella Geurts Radboud University, Netherlands
Sergiu Gherghina University of Glasgow, UK
Deborah Gilboa Private Practice, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Jan Gube Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Evelyn Folake Kissi University of Ghana, Ghana
Daphnee Lee Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Aliye Mavili Anadolu University, Turkey
Juuso Nieminen University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Tish Obst Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Dominique Smith Health Sciences High and Middle College, USA
Shawn Sobers University of West England, UK
Narketta Sparkman-Key James Madison University, USA
Yafit Sulimani-Aidan Tel Aviv University, Israel
Petra Tschakert Curtin University, Australia
Gert Verschraegen University of Antwerp, Belgium
Erin Feinauer Whiting Brigham Young University, USA
Michael Steven Williams University of Missouri, USA
Orlando Woods Singapore Management University, Singapore

Institutional Subscription, E-access